Docs

eth_getBlockByHash - Pulsechain RPC Method

Retrieve complete block data by block hash on Pulsechain. Essential for DeFi developers, staking protocol builders, and teams migrating from Ethereum building on the Ethereum fork L1 with lower gas fees and proof-of-stake consensus.

Returns information about a block by hash on Pulsechain.

Why Pulsechain? Build on the Ethereum fork L1 with lower gas fees and proof-of-stake consensus with full Ethereum state fork, proof-of-stake consensus, lower gas fees than Ethereum mainnet, and PulseX DEX ecosystem.

When to Use This Method

eth_getBlockByHash is essential for DeFi developers, staking protocol builders, and teams migrating from Ethereum:

  • Block verification using deterministic hash lookup: Retrieve block data by its unique, immutable hash on Pulsechain
  • Chain reorganization handling: Track blocks reliably by hash during reorgs on the Ethereum fork L1 with lower gas fees and proof-of-stake consensus
  • Cross-chain bridge finality verification: Confirm block existence by its canonical hash for low-cost DeFi, staking protocols, and Ethereum-compatible dApps with reduced fees
  • Deterministic queries when block number may change: Ensure consistent results for applications that need stable references regardless of chain state

Common Use Cases

1. Verify a Specific Block from a Transaction's blockHash Field

When a transaction response includes blockHash, use eth_getBlockByHash to retrieve the full parent block. This cross-references the transaction's context and confirms which block it was included in on Pulsechain.

JavaScript
import { JsonRpcProvider } from 'ethers';

const provider = new JsonRpcProvider('https://api-pulse-mainnet.n.dwellir.com/YOUR_API_KEY');

async function verifyBlockFromTx(txHash) {
  const tx = await provider.getTransaction(txHash);
  if (!tx || !tx.blockHash) return null;

  const block = await provider.getBlock(tx.blockHash);
  console.log(`Transaction ${txHash} in block #${block.number}`);
  console.log(`Block hash: ${block.hash}`);
  console.log(`Block timestamp: ${new Date(block.timestamp * 1000).toISOString()}`);
  return block;
}

verifyBlockFromTx('0xd9692b0cd832e24983260081d2a6d4862f835466650322101e7b1a3f57cefe25');

2. Cross-Reference Blocks During Chain Reorganization

During a chain reorganization, block numbers can shift but block hashes remain unique identifiers. Use eth_getBlockByHash to verify the canonical chain state and detect whether a previously observed block has been orphaned on the Ethereum fork L1 with lower gas fees and proof-of-stake consensus.

Python
from web3 import Web3

w3 = Web3(Web3.HTTPProvider('https://api-pulse-mainnet.n.dwellir.com/YOUR_API_KEY'))

def verify_block_still_canonical(block_hash):
    block = w3.eth.get_block(block_hash)
    if block is None:
        print(f'Block {block_hash} has been pruned or orphaned')
        return False
    print(f'Block {block_hash} still canonical at height #{block.number}')
    return True

# Check a known block hash
verify_block_still_canonical('0x6f593d6cf3e5a475798567e4defeef46367cdc22556d310bd39bb8f23bdd8f52')

3. Audit Block Data by Known Hash Reference

For compliance and audit workflows, store block hashes as permanent references. Re-querying eth_getBlockByHash with a stored hash guarantees you retrieve the exact same block data, even months later on Pulsechain.

Go
package main

import (
    "context"
    "fmt"
    "log"

    "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common"
    "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/ethclient"
)

func main() {
    client, _ := ethclient.Dial("https://api-pulse-mainnet.n.dwellir.com/YOUR_API_KEY")

    knownHash := common.HexToHash("0x6f593d6cf3e5a475798567e4defeef46367cdc22556d310bd39bb8f23bdd8f52")
    block, err := client.BlockByHash(context.Background(), knownHash)
    if err != nil || block == nil {
        log.Fatal("Block not found: may be pruned from node")
    }

    fmt.Printf("Audited block #%d\n", block.Number().Uint64())
    fmt.Printf("Hash: %s\n", block.Hash().Hex())
    fmt.Printf("Transactions: %d\n", len(block.Transactions()))
}

Best Practices

  • Hash-based lookups are more reliable during chain reorgs than number-based: A block hash uniquely identifies one canonical block, while a block number may shift to a different block after a reorg
  • Store block hashes in your database for future verification: Persisting the hash alongside related records enables deterministic re-querying for audits and data integrity checks
  • Handle null results gracefully: Blocks can be pruned by the node, especially on non-archive endpoints; your application should treat a null response as a missing or unavailable block
  • For L2 optimistic rollups, verify the L1 anchor hash separately: The hash on the L2 chain references a different block space than the L1 anchor; validate both independently for full finality confidence

Code Examples

Error Handling

Error CodeMessageDescription
-32602Invalid paramsInvalid block hash format
-32000Block not foundBlock with this hash does not exist