Hyperliquid Endpoint Options Beyond Public RPC: Alternatives for Scale

Hyperliquid's high-performance Layer 1 blockchain powers one of the fastest decentralized exchanges, but relying on its free public RPC for production applications often leads to frustration. With strict rate limits of 100 requests per minute and shallow L2-only orderbook visibility, developers building trading bots or analytics platforms inevitably hit performance walls. To scale beyond these constraints, understanding your endpoint options – from dedicated nodes to co-located infrastructure – is essential.

Hyperliquid Architecture: Core & EVM

Before diving into the various endpoint offerings, it's essential to understand Hyperliquid's unique dual-network architecture. The platform operates through two integrated components that work in harmony:

HyperCore serves as the native trading engine optimized for perpetual futures and spot trading. It processes up to 200,000 orders per second with sub-second finality, all while maintaining a fully on-chain order book. HyperCore operates without gas fees for trading; users only pay exchange fees on executed trades.

HyperEVM is the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible execution environment that enables developers to deploy Solidity smart contracts and build decentralized applications. Unlike typical Layer 2 rollups, HyperEVM shares the same global state and security guarantees as HyperCore under the HyperBFT consensus mechanism.

This dual architecture means that developers need reliable access to both systems, creating distinct infrastructure requirements that extend far beyond what public endpoints can provide. If you need a refresher on how HyperCore and HyperEVM interlock, skim What Is Hyperliquid? for visuals and terminology you can reference while evaluating infrastructure.

Public RPC Limits & Capabilities

Hyperliquid maintains free public RPC endpoints that serve as an entry point for developers exploring the platform. These endpoints support standard Ethereum JSON-RPC methods like eth_getTransactionByHash, eth_call, and eth_blockNumber for HyperEVM interactions, alongside REST API methods for querying HyperCore trading data. For a visual guide on setting up your infrastructure, check out our video on how to deploy a Hyperliquid RPC node.

The public endpoints are accessible at:

• Mainnet (HyperEVM): HTTPS and WebSocket connections available
• Testnet (HyperEVM): Full testing environment with faucet access

However, public endpoints come with significant constraints. As of August 2025, the public RPC is rate-limited to 100 requests per minute per IP address. This shared infrastructure experiences variable performance based on overall network load, creating unpredictable latency that can be detrimental for time-sensitive applications. The "noisy neighbor effect," where multiple users compete for the same resources, means that performance can degrade significantly during peak usage periods. For prototyping, educational projects, and occasional queries, public endpoints work adequately. But for any production application, real-time market data streaming, or automated trading systems, these limitations quickly become critical bottlenecks.

When you're ready to graduate from the public RPC, follow the provisioning checklist in How to Get a Hyperliquid RPC Node to understand credentials, faucet access, and Dwellir dashboard setup.

Dedicated RPC: Performance & SLAs

Dedicated RPC endpoints represent the next tier of infrastructure, offering exclusive access to isolated nodes with dramatically improved performance characteristics. Multiple third-party providers offer these managed services, each with distinct advantages.

The trade-offs are outlined in our Hyperliquid RPC Providers 2025 comparison provide concrete benchmarks for SLA tiers, throughput guarantees, and pricing models you can map against your workload.

Key Features of Dedicated Endpoints

Enhanced Performance and Throughput: Dedicated endpoints eliminate the shared resource constraints of public infrastructure. Providers typically offer significantly higher request-per-second (RPS) capabilities, with premium plans supporting up to 5,000 RPS or more. This increased capacity is essential for high-frequency trading algorithms, real-time order book monitoring, and applications that need to poll for updates continuously.

Predictable Low Latency: For trading applications where milliseconds matter, dedicated endpoints provide consistent, predictable performance. The isolation from other users' traffic means your application experiences stable response times even during network congestion. Some providers offer global routing and regional deployment options to minimize geographical latency.

Eliminated Rate Limits: While shared endpoints enforce strict rate limits, dedicated infrastructure typically removes these constraints entirely or sets them at levels appropriate for enterprise use. This allows developers to query blockchain state, stream market data, and submit transactions without worrying about hitting throttling thresholds.

Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Professional providers back their dedicated endpoints with uptime guarantees typically ranging from 99.9% to 99.99%. These SLAs include automated failover systems, redundant infrastructure, and 24/7 monitoring to ensure continuous availability. This is critical for applications that require constant uptime.

Advanced Security Features: Dedicated endpoints incorporate enterprise-grade security measures including DDoS protection, encrypted connections (HTTPS for RPC, secure WebSockets, and gRPC), IP whitelisting capabilities, and isolated infrastructure that reduces attack surfaces.

Developer Tools and Monitoring: Most providers include comprehensive dashboards for request-level observability, performance metrics tracking, and usage analytics. These tools enable developers to optimize their applications, identify bottlenecks, and monitor costs effectively.

If you're building trading automation, the architecture blueprint in Build a Hyperliquid Copy Trading Bot with Python shows how higher RPS budgets translate into real-world ingestion and execution pipelines.

Looking for HyperCore gRPC streaming? Dwellir is currently the only provider offering managed Hyperliquid gRPC endpoints with SLA-backed clusters—review the Hyperliquid gRPC docs and contact our team if you need early access or custom routing.

Dedicated Nodes for Unlimited Capacity

Beyond managed RPC endpoints, several providers offer complete dedicated node infrastructure that gives developers even greater control and customization options. You can also watch our walkthrough on using the Order Book Server.

What Dedicated Nodes Provide

Exclusive Infrastructure Access: A dedicated node means you have an entire blockchain node running exclusively for your application. Unlike shared endpoints where multiple users connect to the same infrastructure, dedicated nodes provide complete isolation with dedicated computational resources, storage, and network bandwidth.

Unlimited Request Capacity: True dedicated nodes remove all rate limiting entirely. Your application can make as many requests as the node hardware can handle, typically measured in tens of thousands of requests per second. This unlimited capacity is essential for institutional trading operations and data-intensive applications like blockchain explorers or analytics platforms.

Custom Configuration Options: Dedicated node solutions often allow for tailored infrastructure setups including:

• Geographic deployment selection for optimal latency
• Custom hardware specifications to match application requirements
• Specialized configurations for specific use cases like historical data access or trace APIs
• Load balancing strategies optimized for your traffic patterns

Protocol Support: Full node deployments typically support multiple connection protocols including HTTP/HTTPS, WebSockets (WSS), and gRPC interfaces. This comprehensive protocol support enables optimal integration regardless of your application architecture.

Archive and Historical Data: Maintaining a full historical state on Hyperliquid is infrastructure-intensive due to rapid state growth (often exceeding 600GB per day). Instead of managing petabytes of storage on a live node, many teams utilize managed S3 buckets to access historical fills and trade data. This approach provides a cost-effective way to feed analytics platforms, tax reporting tools, and backtesting engines without the overhead of a full archival node.

To see how teams combine archive reads with live streaming, check out How to Use the Hyperliquid Orderbook Server for concrete ingestion patterns.

Co-Location for Ultra-Low Latency

For the most demanding applications—particularly high-frequency trading strategies and competitive market-making operations—some infrastructure providers offer co-location services where you can deploy your trading software directly adjacent to the node infrastructure.

Benefits of Co-Location

The primary advantage of co-location is the dramatic reduction in network latency. By running your application servers in the same data center as the node infrastructure, you achieve sub-millisecond response times and eliminate the routing variability inherent in the public internet. This ensures your requests take the shortest possible physical path to the blockchain, a critical factor for strategies that depend on being first to react to market conditions. In competitive liquidations or arbitrage, this proximity can be the deciding factor between a profitable trade and a missed opportunity.

Additionally, professional co-location facilities offer enhanced reliability through enterprise-grade power redundancy, advanced cooling systems, and physical security that exceeds standard cloud hosting environments. For latency-sensitive applications, like the bot outlined in Building a Real-Time Hyperliquid Liquidation Tracker, this combination of speed and stability is essential, as every microsecond saved translates directly into better fill quality.

Compare Hyperliquid RPC Providers

Several reputable infrastructure providers offer Hyperliquid endpoint solutions, each with distinctive strengths and pricing models.

For a deeper dive into per-provider pros and cons, pair this overview with our dedicated Hyperliquid RPC Providers 2025 comparison guide.

Pricing Considerations

Hyperliquid RPC endpoint pricing in 2025 varies significantly based on the provider, service tier, and your specific usage patterns. While entry-level plans are often sufficient for development and testing, scaling to production workloads typically requires moving to growth or enterprise tiers to ensure consistent performance and dedicated support.

Feature Comparisons

When evaluating providers, simply looking at price isn't enough. Developers should consider several key differentiators that directly impact development velocity and application reliability. The table below highlights critical features to look for when choosing a partner for your Hyperliquid infrastructure:

Endpoint Use Cases: Bots to dApps

Understanding which endpoint solution matches your specific requirements is critical for both performance and cost optimization. Different applications have vastly different needs. A simple portfolio tracker doesn't require the same sub-millisecond latency as an arbitrage bot. The following breakdown matches common use cases with their ideal infrastructure tier:

Technical Integration & Security

Successfully integrating with Hyperliquid endpoints requires understanding several technical aspects regardless of which tier you select.

Authentication and Security

Most managed endpoint providers issue unique API keys or endpoint URLs that serve as authentication credentials. Dedicated endpoints often support additional security layers including IP whitelisting, which restricts access to specific addresses, and API key rotation policies for enhanced security postures.

For HyperCore trading operations, Hyperliquid supports API wallets (also called agent wallets) that can perform trading actions on behalf of your account without having withdrawal permissions. This architecture adds an important security layer for bot operations. Even if API credentials are compromised, funds cannot be withdrawn.

Connection Protocols

Understanding which protocols your application needs is important for selecting the right endpoint:

HTTPS/JSON-RPC works best for standard blockchain queries, transaction submission, and applications that don't require continuous updates. The request-response model is straightforward to implement using standard HTTP libraries.

WebSocket (WSS) connections enable real-time streaming of data including block updates, pending transactions, and event logs. This bidirectional persistent connection is ideal for applications needing live updates without constant polling.

gRPC provides efficient binary serialization and is particularly valuable for accessing HyperCore Layer 1 streaming data like order book updates, fills, and market information. The strongly-typed interface and performance characteristics make gRPC ideal for high-throughput applications. Dwellir currently operates the only managed Hyperliquid gRPC streaming cluster; reference the Hyperliquid gRPC documentation for method schemas, subscription templates, and authentication flow examples.

Optimizing Request Patterns

Efficient use of endpoint infrastructure requires thoughtful application design. Even the most powerful dedicated node can be overwhelmed by inefficient query patterns. By implementing the following optimization strategies, you can significantly reduce load, lower costs, and improve the overall responsiveness of your application:

• Batch Requests combine multiple queries into single calls where supported, reducing network overhead and improving throughput.

• Caching Strategies for blockchain data that doesn't change frequently (like historical blocks or transaction receipts) can dramatically reduce endpoint load and costs.

• WebSocket Subscriptions are more efficient than polling when you need continuous updates. Subscribe to specific events rather than repeatedly querying for changes.

• Connection Pooling and persistent connections reduce the overhead of establishing new connections for every request, particularly important for high-frequency applications.

Selecting Your Infrastructure Tier

Selecting the appropriate endpoint infrastructure depends on several factors specific to your project requirements, budget, and growth trajectory. It's not just about where you are today, but where you plan to be in six months. Consider these key dimensions when making your infrastructure decision:

• Development Stage: Early-stage projects and prototypes can typically start with public endpoints or entry-level managed services, scaling up as usage patterns become clear and user demands increase.

• Performance Requirements: Applications with strict latency requirements or high request volumes should skip directly to dedicated infrastructure to avoid the costly migration from public endpoints mid-development.

• Budget Constraints: For bootstrapped projects, managed shared endpoints with generous free tiers or pay-as-you-go pricing models offer a middle ground between public infrastructure and dedicated nodes.

• Technical Expertise: Self-hosting nodes requires significant DevOps expertise for setup, monitoring, security hardening, and maintenance. Most teams find managed solutions more cost-effective when factoring in engineering time.

• Scalability Plans: Consider your six-month and one-year growth projections. Providers offering seamless scaling from shared to dedicated infrastructure can simplify the transition as your application grows.

• Geographic Distribution: Applications serving global users benefit from providers with multi-region deployments that can reduce latency through intelligent routing.

Production Deployment Best Practices

Successfully running production applications on Hyperliquid infrastructure requires attention to several operational considerations.

Implement Robust Error Handling

Network issues, rate limits, and temporary node availability problems can occur even with premium infrastructure. Implement exponential backoff retry logic, graceful degradation strategies, and comprehensive error logging to maintain application stability.

Monitor Performance Metrics

Track critical metrics including request latency (especially p95 and p99 percentiles), error rates, rate limit consumption, and throughput patterns. Most dedicated endpoint providers offer observability dashboards, but application-level monitoring provides additional insights.

Plan for Failover

Even with high SLA guarantees, implementing failover strategies protects against outages. This might include:

• Secondary backup endpoints from the same or different providers
• Graceful degradation modes that reduce functionality rather than failing completely
• Health check systems that automatically switch to backup infrastructure

Optimize Costs Through Usage Analysis

Regularly analyze your request patterns to identify optimization opportunities. Caching, batching, and reducing unnecessary polling can significantly reduce infrastructure costs without impacting application performance.

Stay Updated on Protocol Changes

Blockchain platforms evolve rapidly. Subscribe to provider notifications, join community channels, and monitor official documentation for changes to API methods, consensus mechanisms, or infrastructure upgrades that might affect your application.

Why Specialized Infrastructure Matters

As the Web3 ecosystem matures, the role of reliable blockchain infrastructure becomes increasingly critical to application success. Hyperliquid's architecture, which combines high-performance trading capabilities with EVM compatibility, creates unique infrastructure demands that generic solutions struggle to address effectively.

This is where specialized infrastructure providers like Dwellir create value. By focusing on delivering cost-efficient, developer-friendly APIs with dedicated clusters, global infrastructure, and transparent pricing models, these providers enable teams to focus on building innovative applications rather than managing complex blockchain node infrastructure.

Dwellir's approach to Hyperliquid infrastructure includes both shared endpoints for development and testing, as well as dedicated node solutions starting at competitive monthly pricing. The platform supports standard HyperEVM JSON-RPC methods alongside custom gRPC streaming interfaces for HyperCore Layer 1 data, providing comprehensive access to both aspects of the Hyperliquid ecosystem. With clear SLAs guaranteeing 99.9%+ uptime, DDoS protection, and the option for cloud hosting that enables sub-millisecond response times when running trading software directly next to node infrastructure, developers have the flexibility to scale from prototype to production without infrastructure becoming a bottleneck.

Future of Hyperliquid Endpoints

As Hyperliquid continues to evolve and adoption grows, infrastructure requirements will become even more sophisticated. The ecosystem is moving towards smarter, more resilient systems that can handle the demands of global finance. Several trends are currently shaping the future of endpoint offerings:

• Increased Specialization: Providers are likely to offer more specialized endpoints optimized for specific use cases like market data streaming, historical analytics, or transaction submission, each tuned for its particular workload.

• Enhanced Observability: Deeper insights into request performance, blockchain state access patterns, and application-level metrics will help developers optimize both performance and costs.

• Multi-Chain Orchestration: As DeFi strategies increasingly span multiple chains, infrastructure providers that offer unified access to Hyperliquid alongside other networks will streamline cross-chain development.

• AI-Assisted Optimization: Machine learning systems may help optimize caching strategies, predict usage patterns, and automatically scale infrastructure based on application demands.

• Decentralized Infrastructure: The emergence of decentralized node networks could provide additional redundancy and censorship resistance while maintaining performance characteristics comparable to centralized providers.

Summary: Choosing the Right Endpoint

While Hyperliquid's public endpoints provide a valuable starting point for exploration and education, the demands of production applications, professional trading operations, and enterprise-grade dApps require more robust infrastructure solutions. Understanding the full spectrum of offerings, from managed shared endpoints through dedicated nodes to co-location services, enables developers to make informed decisions aligned with their performance requirements, budget constraints, and growth trajectories.

The choice between public endpoints, managed dedicated endpoints, or full node solutions isn't merely technical. It directly impacts application performance, user experience, development velocity, and ultimately, project success. By carefully evaluating requirements against available options and selecting infrastructure partners that align with project needs, developers can build on Hyperliquid's powerful Layer 1 blockchain with confidence. Ready to architect beyond public RPC? Review the Hyperliquid gRPC docs for streaming schemas and contact the Dwellir team to provision HTTPS, WebSocket, and gRPC clusters tailored to your latency and throughput goals.