---
title: Best Arbitrum RPC Providers 2025
description: >-
  Compare the top 7 Arbitrum RPC providers for 2025. Comprehensive archive node
  analysis, pricing transparency evaluation, and performance metrics to help you
  choose the right infrastructure for DeFi protocols, block explorers, and
  data-intensive applications on Arbitrum's leading Layer 2.
date: '2025-11-10'
tags: >-
  Arbitrum, RPC, Archive Nodes, DeFi, Layer 2, Infrastructure, Developer Tools,
  Web3 Development, Ethereum Scaling, Trace API, Debug API
imageUrl: /posts/TopArbitrumProviders.png
category: Listicles
---

Arbitrum has established itself as the leading Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution, securing over $17.55 billion in Total Value Locked while processing 3.4 million transactions daily across 400+ decentralized applications. Built using Optimistic Rollup technology, Arbitrum achieves 250-millisecond block times and theoretical throughput of 40,000 transactions per second—performance that makes it the preferred platform for DeFi protocols like GMX ($780M TVL), block explorers like Arbiscan, and trading infrastructure requiring comprehensive historical data access.

However, Arbitrum's explosive growth has created a unique infrastructure challenge: **archive nodes now require 30 terabytes of storage and grow by 2-3 terabytes monthly**, making Arbitrum what industry insiders call "a very big archive chain." This massive storage requirement—larger than most Layer 1 blockchains—means archive access pricing varies dramatically across providers, with some charging zero premium while others implement compute unit multipliers that can increase costs by 40-80x for trace and debug operations.

Whether you're building DeFi analytics platforms requiring historical yield calculations, operating block explorers serving millions of queries, deploying trading bots analyzing transaction patterns, or developing compliance tools for institutional clients, selecting the right RPC provider with proper archive access directly impacts your application's capabilities, performance, and infrastructure costs. This guide examines leading Arbitrum providers based on archive node availability, pricing transparency, trace/debug API support, and production-grade reliability.

A critical note on pricing: Most providers price services using "compute units" or "API credits" rather than straightforward request counts, and multipliers vary dramatically. A single trace API call might consume 1 to 80 compute units depending on the provider's multiplier system. This means a provider advertising $0.10 per million compute units could actually cost $8.00 per million trace requests, while another charging $5.00 per million requests with 1:1 pricing delivers transparent, predictable costs. When evaluating providers, always calculate costs based on your actual request mix—particularly trace and debug operations that drive archive infrastructure expenses.

## 1. Dwellir – Best for Enterprise-Grade Infrastructure with Transparent Pricing

![Dwellir](https://www.dwellir.com/competitors/dwellir.png)

Dwellir delivers production-ready blockchain infrastructure with industry-leading pricing transparency, comprehensive Arbitrum archive support including full trace and debug APIs, and enterprise-grade reliability across 150+ blockchain networks.

**Why Dwellir Stands Out:**

Unlike providers hiding costs behind compute unit multipliers, Dwellir employs straightforward **"1 Response = 1 Credit" pricing across all operations**—including computationally intensive trace and debug API calls that competitors charge 40-80x premiums for. This means querying current state costs exactly the same as replaying historical transactions or tracing complex smart contract interactions. **Critically, Dwellir is one of the few providers offering dedicated archive node endpoints** with zero premium for historical data access, giving developers complete Arbitrum history from genesis without billing surprises.

Dwellir's global infrastructure spans four continents with bare-metal servers in self-hosted data centers, delivering consistently low latency whether your users connect from Singapore, Stockholm, or São Paulo. With over 2,000 RPS capacity and 10x burst protection, the infrastructure handles sudden traffic spikes without throttling—critical for DeFi protocols during market volatility or analytics platforms experiencing viral growth. For institutional trading operations requiring absolute minimum latency, Dwellir offers colocation options to place compute directly adjacent to Arbitrum nodes, achieving sub-10ms response times.

**Key Features:**

- **Enterprise-grade infrastructure** with 99.99% uptime SLA and multi-continent presence
- **True 1:1 transparent pricing** eliminating compute unit complexity entirely
- **Dedicated archive endpoints** with zero premium for historical data access
- **Full trace and debug API support** at same 1:1 pricing (no 40x-80x multipliers)
- **150+ blockchain networks** enabling seamless multi-chain development
- **Over 2,000 RPS capacity** with 10x burst protection for traffic spikes
- **Bare-metal infrastructure** in self-hosted data centers (privacy-focused, no AWS/GCP dependencies)
- **Direct technical support** from infrastructure experts understanding blockchain architecture
- **Colocation options** for ultra-low-latency institutional trading applications

**Pricing Structure:**

Dwellir's Developer plan at $49/month provides 25 million requests at $1.96 per million calls—among the most competitive rates available with transparent pricing. The Growth plan ($299/month for 150 million requests) and Scale plan ($999/month for 500 million requests) maintain consistent per-request pricing around $2.00 per million calls, with Enterprise tiers available at $1-2 per million for high-volume applications.

**Critically, archive data access and trace/debug API calls cost exactly the same as standard queries**—no compute unit multipliers, no surprise overages. This predictable cost structure eliminates budget uncertainty. For DeFi analytics platforms processing 100 million monthly requests (60% standard queries, 40% trace/debug operations), Dwellir costs $424/month ($49 base + 75M × $5 overage). Compare this to competitors charging $999-$21,000 monthly for equivalent usage due to trace API multipliers.

**Best For:** Enterprise DeFi protocols demanding transparent cost forecasting at scale, institutional analytics platforms requiring comprehensive trace/debug access without 40x-80x premiums, high-frequency trading operations where predictable pricing and ultra-low latency are non-negotiable, block explorer infrastructure processing millions of historical queries, and multi-chain applications needing consistent infrastructure across 150+ networks. Particularly suited for teams building compliance tools, forensic analysis platforms, or any application where archive access costs significantly impact unit economics.

## 2. QuickNode – Best for Comprehensive Developer Ecosystem and Tooling

![QuickNode](https://www.dwellir.com/competitors/quicknode.png)

QuickNode has built an extensive developer platform delivering sophisticated monitoring, analytics, and a comprehensive add-on marketplace—particularly attractive for teams prioritizing rich tooling and extended functionality over pricing simplicity.

**Why QuickNode Delivers Value:**

QuickNode's infrastructure emphasizes developer experience through extensive tooling rather than just raw RPC access. Their multi-region network automatically routes requests to optimal endpoints, while comprehensive monitoring dashboards provide granular visibility into performance metrics, error rates, and usage patterns. **Archive node access is built into all tiers including the free plan**, making historical data immediately available without special configuration or premium charges.

The platform's differentiator is its extensive add-on marketplace. Beyond basic RPC access, QuickNode provides Webhooks for real-time event notifications, Streams for continuous data pipelines, NFT APIs for token metadata, and various specialized services. For teams building complex applications requiring multiple infrastructure components, this consolidated ecosystem reduces integration complexity versus assembling services from multiple vendors. The platform also offers full trace API support, enabling comprehensive transaction analysis across Arbitrum's complete history.

**Key Features:**

- **Archive node access** built into all tiers including free plan
- **Full trace and debug API support** for comprehensive historical analysis
- **Comprehensive add-on marketplace** including Webhooks, Streams, and specialized APIs
- **Advanced monitoring and analytics** dashboards with real-time metrics and error tracking
- **Global infrastructure** with intelligent request routing and multi-region redundancy
- **Extensive developer tooling** for debugging, testing, and optimization
- **Security certifications** including SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 for regulated applications
- **Dedicated support channels** with guaranteed response SLAs for critical issues

**Pricing Structure:**

QuickNode operates on API Credit-based pricing where different methods consume varying credits. Arbitrum queries use a **20x base multiplier** for all methods, with additional multipliers for complex operations. The Build plan starts at $49/month for 80 million API Credits with 50 RPS. With Arbitrum's 20x multiplier per standard call, this translates to roughly 4 million actual requests. Trace and debug operations consume 40-80 API Credits per call (2x-4x additional multiplier on top of the 20x base).

The Scale plan ($499/month for 950 million credits) and Business plan ($999/month for 2 billion credits) maintain similar economics. At $999/month, the Business plan provides approximately 100 million standard Arbitrum requests or 25-50 million trace/debug requests, depending on operation complexity. Overage pricing is $10 per 1 million API Credits.

**Real Cost Analysis:** For 100 million mixed requests (60% standard, 40% trace/debug), QuickNode costs approximately $999/month (Business tier base) if usage stays within limits, or significantly more with overages. A heavily trace-oriented workload (analytics platform making 50% trace calls) could cost $15,000-$20,000 monthly due to the stacked multipliers (20x base × 2-4x method = 40x-80x effective cost).

While this compute unit approach creates pricing complexity, QuickNode's value proposition centers on the comprehensive tooling ecosystem rather than cost optimization. Teams leveraging multiple add-ons, advanced monitoring, and specialized APIs may find the consolidated platform architecture reduces overall development costs despite higher per-request pricing.

**Best For:** Development teams prioritizing comprehensive tooling and monitoring over pricing simplicity, applications requiring multiple specialized services from QuickNode's add-on marketplace, projects where advanced analytics and debugging capabilities accelerate development, and teams building complex applications benefiting from consolidated infrastructure. The platform approach suits developers valuing rich ecosystem features and willing to manage compute unit complexity for access to extensive tooling.

## 3. Chainstack – Best for Rapid Deployment and Elastic Scaling

![Chainstack](https://www.dwellir.com/competitors/chainstack.png)

Chainstack combines instant provisioning, transparent 1:1 pricing, and elastic infrastructure—particularly valuable for teams transitioning from development to production or experiencing rapid growth requiring immediate scaling capabilities.

**Chainstack's Advantages:**

Chainstack's patented **Bolt fast-sync technology** enables near-instant provisioning of fully synchronized Arbitrum archive nodes, eliminating typical multi-day waiting periods that delay development. Their transparent **1:1 request pricing** removes compute unit confusion—a trace API call costs the same as a balance query, delivering straightforward cost calculations. **Note that archive queries consume 2 response units**, though this remains significantly more transparent than competitors charging 20x-80x multipliers for trace operations. Elastic node clusters automatically scale with demand spikes, critical for DeFi protocols during market volatility or analytics platforms experiencing viral adoption.

**Archive node support begins at the Growth tier ($49/month)**, with full trace and debug API access available on Business tier and above. Chainstack's unique **Unlimited Node** option provides truly unlimited requests within chosen rate limit tiers, offering completely predictable costs for high-volume applications regardless of request mix.

**Key Features:**

- **Instant archive node deployment** via Bolt technology (minutes instead of days)
- **Transparent 1:1 request pricing** with no compute unit confusion (archive queries use 2 response units)
- **Elastic infrastructure** that automatically scales with demand patterns
- **Full trace and debug API support** on archive nodes (Business tier+)
- **Unlimited Node option** for flat-fee unlimited requests at fixed RPS
- **Multi-cloud deployment** options across AWS, Google Cloud, and bare metal
- **Free tier** providing 3 million monthly requests for development and testing
- **SOC2 certification** and enterprise security features
- **Sub-1 second failover** with automatic rerouting during incidents

**Pricing Structure:**

Chainstack's Growth plan begins at $49/month for 20 million requests with 250 RPS, delivering straightforward $2.45 per million request pricing. The Pro plan ($199/month for 80 million requests) and Business plan ($349/month for 140 million requests) maintain consistent $2.48-2.49 per million pricing. Enterprise tiers offer volume discounts down to $5 per million, with custom configurations available.

**The Unlimited Node option** (starting at $149/month) provides genuinely unlimited requests within RPS tiers (25, 100, 250, 500, or 1000 RPS), creating completely predictable monthly costs. For a 500 RPS unlimited node processing 200+ million requests monthly, effective cost drops to approximately $2 per million—exceptional value for high-volume operations.

**Real Cost Analysis:** For 100 million monthly requests with standard (non-archive) queries, Chainstack's Business tier costs $349 base (covers 140M requests). For exactly 100M, you'd use Pro tier at $199 plus minimal overage. **Archive queries consume 2 response units** (meaning 50 million archive requests = 100 million response units), while trace/debug operations on current state maintain 1:1 pricing. This 2x multiplier for archive access is significantly more reasonable than competitors charging 20x-80x for similar functionality.

This transparency combined with elastic scaling and instant archive deployment makes financial planning straightforward. Unlike compute unit systems requiring conversion calculations, you know exactly what 50 million requests will cost. The unlimited tiers eliminate usage anxiety entirely for applications with variable but potentially massive throughput.

**Best For:** DeFi protocols requiring elastic infrastructure for transaction volume spikes during market events, analytics platforms experiencing unpredictable growth, development teams prioritizing rapid deployment and infrastructure flexibility, applications transitioning from predictable development loads to variable production traffic, and any project where the Unlimited Node option's predictable costs outweigh pay-per-request economics. The Bolt fast-sync technology particularly benefits teams needing immediate archive access without multi-day node synchronization delays.

## 4. Alchemy – Best for Developer Tools and Enhanced APIs

![Alchemy](https://www.dwellir.com/competitors/alchemy.png)

Alchemy has established itself as a comprehensive development platform delivering advanced APIs, sophisticated monitoring, and extensive developer tooling—though with a critical limitation for Arbitrum applications requiring trace functionality.

**Why Alchemy Stands Out:**

Alchemy's Supernode infrastructure emphasizes developer experience through proprietary enhancements beyond standard RPC. Their platform provides NFT APIs, enhanced webhooks, mempool visualization, transaction simulation, and comprehensive SDK support across multiple programming languages. **Archive node access is included on all tiers** including the free plan (30M compute units monthly), making historical data immediately accessible.

However, **Alchemy has a critical limitation for Arbitrum: trace API methods are not supported**. While trace functionality works on Ethereum mainnet, it is explicitly unavailable for Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova. This makes Alchemy unsuitable for DeFi analytics platforms, block explorers, MEV researchers, or any application requiring transaction tracing—despite otherwise strong infrastructure and tooling.

**Key Features:**

- **Archive node access** included on all tiers with no additional premium
- **Debug API support** available on paid tiers (not on free tier)
- **Critical limitation**: ❌ **NO Trace API support for Arbitrum** (Ethereum only)
- **Supernode infrastructure** with claimed 2.5x performance improvements
- **Enhanced APIs** including NFT, Notify, Transfers, and Transaction Simulation
- **Comprehensive SDKs** for JavaScript, Python, Ruby, Java, Go, and Swift
- **Advanced monitoring** with request explorer, error tracking, and 6-month history
- **99.995% uptime guarantee** on Enterprise tier
- **Multi-chain support** across 50+ networks including L2s

**Pricing Structure:**

As of February 2025, Alchemy launched **Pay As You Go** pricing to improve transparency. The free tier provides 30M Compute Units monthly (approximately 1.2M requests). PAYG pricing is $0.45 per 1M CU for the first 300M CU monthly, then $0.40 per 1M CU above 300M. Enterprise tiers (20B+ CU/month) have custom pricing.

Alchemy's compute unit costs vary by method complexity:
- **eth_blockNumber**: 10 CU
- **eth_call**: 26 CU  
- **eth_getBalance**: 19 CU
- **eth_getLogs**: 75 CU
- **eth_sendRawTransaction**: 250 CU
- **debug_traceTransaction**: 1,000 CU (but ❌ **NO Trace API** for Arbitrum)

**Average**: ~25 CU per request (Alchemy's stated average)

**Real Cost Analysis:** For 100 million average requests (25 CU each), total consumption is 2.5 billion CU. At PAYG rates, this costs approximately $1,000-$1,125 monthly depending on whether usage exceeds 300M CU threshold. Archive queries cost the same as current state—no premium. However, **the lack of trace API support for Arbitrum** makes this pricing analysis largely irrelevant for applications requiring transaction tracing, as they cannot use Alchemy regardless of cost competitiveness.

**Technical Note:** Debug API methods (debug_traceTransaction, debug_traceCall, debug_traceBlockByNumber) are available on Arbitrum for PAYG+ tiers, though trace functionality is limited compared to providers with full trace API implementations.

**Best For:** Developers building applications NOT requiring trace API functionality—such as wallet interfaces, token tracking, NFT marketplaces, or transaction submission services. The comprehensive SDK support, enhanced APIs, and sophisticated monitoring make Alchemy attractive for these use cases. However, **DeFi analytics platforms, block explorers, MEV researchers, compliance tools, and any application requiring comprehensive transaction tracing should avoid Alchemy** due to the missing trace API support for Arbitrum.

## 5. Ankr – Best for Decentralized Infrastructure and Geographic Distribution

![Ankr](https://www.dwellir.com/competitors/ankr.png)

Ankr operates a globally distributed network spanning 80+ chains with emphasis on decentralization and geographic diversity, though their compute unit economics require careful cost evaluation for high-volume applications.

**Ankr's Approach:**

Ankr's **decentralized infrastructure** routes requests across 30+ global regions operated by independent node providers, reducing single-point-of-failure risks inherent in centralized platforms. Their pay-as-you-go model eliminates long-term commitments, allowing precise scaling as needs evolve. **Archive node access is available on both free and paid tiers**, with trace and debug APIs accessible on Premium plans. Extensive multi-chain support spanning 80+ networks simplifies infrastructure management for applications operating across multiple blockchain ecosystems.

The geographic distribution provides natural redundancy. If regional infrastructure experiences issues, requests automatically route to alternative regions without application-level intervention. Ankr's **Advanced API suite** supplements standard RPC with NFT APIs, Token APIs, and Query APIs—providing indexed blockchain data beyond basic node access.

**Key Features:**

- **Decentralized infrastructure** across 30+ geographic regions for redundancy
- **Archive node access** available on Freemium and Premium tiers
- **Trace and debug APIs** available on Premium tier only
- **Pay-as-you-go pricing** with no long-term commitments or contracts
- **Support for 80+ blockchain networks** (industry-leading breadth)
- **Advanced API suite** including NFT, Token, and Query APIs
- **WebSocket support** on Freemium and Premium tiers
- **Free tier** providing 200M API credits monthly (approximately 1M Arbitrum requests)
- **Node revenue sharing** with 70% distributed to stakers and operators

**Pricing Structure:**

Ankr implements pay-as-you-go pricing at **$0.10 USD = 1M API Credits**. However, Arbitrum requests use **200 credits per call**, meaning actual costs are **$20 per million requests**. Advanced API methods cost 700 credits per call ($70 per million requests). WebSocket subscriptions consume 200 credits each.

Deal Subscription option: $500/month for 6 billion API credits (20% discount), equivalent to 30 million Arbitrum requests monthly.

**Real Cost Analysis:** For 100 million Arbitrum requests, costs are:
- **PAYG**: 20 billion credits = **$2,000/month**
- **Subscription**: ~3.3 subscriptions = **~$1,650/month**

Archive requests cost the same as standard queries—no premium. However, trace and debug APIs require Premium tier and consume standard 200 credits per request.

**Free Tier (Freemium):** 200M API credits monthly provides approximately 1M Arbitrum requests with full archive access. Rate limits are 30 requests/second. **Critical**: trace and debug APIs require Premium upgrade—not available on free tier.

**Premium Tier:** Rate limits increase to 1,500 RPS (EVM chains) with access to trace/debug APIs, whitelists (IP, domain, contract), and 24/7 priority support. Pure PAYG or $500/month subscription pricing.

**Best For:** Applications prioritizing decentralized infrastructure philosophy and architectural resilience over cost optimization, multi-chain platforms requiring comprehensive blockchain coverage across 80+ networks, teams valuing geographic distribution and redundancy, and developers leveraging Advanced API suite for NFT/token data beyond basic RPC. The generous free tier (1M requests) and decentralized approach suit teams philosophically aligned with Web3 principles, though **$20 per million requests** makes Ankr approximately **4-10x more expensive** than transparent pricing providers (Dwellir at $5/million, Chainstack at $2.45/million) for high-volume applications.

## 6. GetBlock – Best for Flexible Prepaid Models and Archive Access

![GetBlock](https://www.dwellir.com/competitors/getblock.png)

GetBlock provides straightforward blockchain infrastructure with recently enhanced archive capabilities and unique prepaid pricing that doesn't expire—offering flexibility uncommon among major providers.

**Why GetBlock Delivers Value:**

GetBlock's October 2024 launch of **Archive Mode for Shared Node endpoints** democratized archive access, previously available only via expensive Dedicated Nodes. The new Archive Mode activates instantly via dashboard toggle, providing complete Arbitrum history starting at just **$39/month** (annual pricing) or $49/month. **Archive requests consume 2x standard Compute Units**—a reasonable premium compared to competitors charging 20x-80x multipliers for trace operations.

The platform's unique **prepaid request model** stands out: purchased compute units never expire, unlike typical monthly allocations that reset. This flexibility benefits projects with variable usage patterns—development teams ramping up testing, seasonal applications, or research projects with sporadic heavy usage. Combined with unlimited endpoints per account and instant archive activation, GetBlock offers operational flexibility uncommon in the provider landscape.

**Key Features:**

- **Archive Mode** launched October 2024 for Shared Nodes (previously Dedicated only)
- **2x CU multiplier** for archive requests (reasonable vs 20x-80x elsewhere)
- **Prepaid credits never expire** — unique flexibility vs monthly resets
- **Instant archive activation** via dashboard toggle (activates in seconds)
- **Unlimited endpoints** per account for multi-environment setups
- **WebSocket support** on all tiers for real-time data subscriptions
- **Trace and Debug APIs** available on Dedicated Nodes; limited on Shared
- **50+ blockchain networks** with unified API access
- **99.99% average uptime** with 1 GB/sec speed infrastructure

**Pricing Structure:**

GetBlock transitioned to Compute Unit (CU) based pricing in March 2025. Archive requests consume **2x the standard Compute Units** but require no additional subscription fee beyond the base tier.

**Pricing Tiers:**
- **Free**: 40,000 requests/day (~1.2M/month), up to 60 RPS (no archive access on free tier)
- **Starter**: $39/month annual ($49 monthly) — Archive Mode enabled, 10 access tokens, prepaid CU allocation
- **Pro**: $399/month annual ($499 monthly) — Archive Mode, 50 access tokens, priority support, higher CU allocation
- **Enterprise**: From $999/month — Custom CU configuration, highest capacity
- **Dedicated Nodes**: From $1,000/month — Unlimited requests, unlimited rate limits, full archive, complete trace/debug API access

**Real Cost Analysis:** GetBlock's CU-based pricing with 2x archive multiplier makes it moderately transparent. For 100 million requests with mixed archive usage, costs typically range $800-1,500/month depending on specific CU allocation and usage mix. The 2x multiplier for archive is **dramatically lower** than QuickNode's 40x-80x trace multipliers, making GetBlock more cost-effective for archive-heavy workloads.

**Unique Advantages:**

The **no-expiration prepaid model** is genuinely unique—perfect for:
- Development teams with variable testing cycles
- Research projects with sporadic heavy usage
- Seasonal applications with predictable quiet periods
- Organizations preferring CapEx vs OpEx budgeting

**Dedicated Node Option:** For applications requiring unlimited requests and full trace/debug API access without CU complexity, GetBlock's Dedicated Nodes (from $1,000/month) provide completely unlimited usage with fixed monthly costs—excellent for block explorers or analytics platforms with massive, unpredictable query volumes.

**Best For:** Teams requiring archive access with moderate usage (Starter tier excellent entry point at $39-49/month), projects with variable usage patterns benefiting from non-expiring prepaid credits, organizations preferring flexible prepaid models over recurring subscriptions, and developers needing unlimited endpoints for multi-environment deployments. The 2x archive multiplier makes GetBlock cost-effective for archive-heavy workloads compared to providers with 20x-80x multipliers. Dedicated Nodes suit applications requiring unlimited usage and full trace/debug API access with completely predictable monthly costs.

## 7. Infura – Best for Ethereum Ecosystem Integration and MetaMask Compatibility

![Infura](https://www.dwellir.com/competitors/infura.png)

Infura delivers established blockchain infrastructure backed by ConsenSys, offering deep Ethereum ecosystem integration and serving as the default RPC provider for MetaMask—ensuring compatibility and reliability for Ethereum-aligned applications.

**Why Infura Delivers Value:**

Infura's position as **MetaMask's default RPC provider** means your Arbitrum applications automatically work for millions of MetaMask users without configuration. This ecosystem integration, combined with ConsenSys backing and participation in the **Decentralized Infrastructure Network (DIN)**, provides reliability through partnerships with Microsoft, Tencent, Chainstack, and other major infrastructure players.

**Archive node access is automatically enabled** for all Arbitrum users, with archive data currently costing the same as standard requests (though documentation notes "this might change in the near future"). Trace and debug APIs route through DIN partner infrastructure rather than native Infura nodes—an architectural choice providing redundancy through decentralization but adding complexity compared to providers with native trace implementation.

**Key Features:**

- **Archive access automatically enabled** for all Arbitrum users with no special configuration
- **Zero archive premium currently** (same pricing as standard requests, subject to change)
- **MetaMask default provider** serving 1M+ wallet users automatically
- **DIN network participation** providing failover to partners (Microsoft, Tencent, Chainstack, Grove, Pocket)
- **Trace and Debug APIs** available via DIN partner routing (not native infrastructure)
- **WebSocket support** currently in **PUBLIC BETA** for Arbitrum (not production-ready as of Nov 2025)
- **ConsenSys backing** with institutional credibility and ecosystem integration
- **Multi-chain Gas API** powering MetaMask gas optimization
- **Enterprise failover** via DIN (Enterprise tier only—no failover on lower tiers)

**Pricing Structure:**

Infura uses credit-based pricing with method-specific costs. Arbitrum queries consume varying credits based on complexity:

**Credit Costs for Common Arbitrum Methods:**
- **eth_blockNumber, eth_call, eth_getBalance**: 80 credits
- **eth_getLogs**: 255 credits
- **eth_estimateGas**: 300 credits
- **trace_* methods** (via DIN): 300 credits
- **debug_* methods** (via DIN): 1,000 credits

**Pricing Tiers:**
- **Free**: 6M credits/day (~2.25M requests/month for standard calls), no archive access
- **Developer**: $50/month, 15M credits/day (~5.6M requests/month)
- **Team**: $225/month, 75M credits/day (~28M requests/month)
- **Enterprise**: Custom pricing for 75M+ credits/day

**Real Cost Analysis:** For 100 million standard eth_call requests consuming 80 credits each:
- Total: 8 billion credits
- Developer tier (15M credits/day = 450M/month): Insufficient capacity
- Team tier (75M credits/day = 2.25B/month): Insufficient capacity
- Requires Enterprise tier: Custom pricing, estimated **$2,500-3,500/month**

Archive requests currently cost the same as standard queries (no premium), but heavy trace/debug usage (1,000 credits per debug call) significantly increases costs. For mixed workloads with substantial trace operations, Infura becomes **2-5x more expensive** than transparent pricing providers.

**Critical Limitations:**

**WebSocket in Beta:** As of November 2025, WebSocket support for Arbitrum remains in **PUBLIC BETA**—not recommended for production applications requiring real-time subscriptions. Production applications needing WebSocket should use providers with stable implementations (Dwellir, QuickNode, Chainstack, Ankr).

**Trace/Debug via DIN:** Trace and debug APIs route through Decentralized Infrastructure Network partners rather than native Infura infrastructure. While this provides redundancy, it adds latency and architectural complexity compared to providers with native trace implementations.

**AWS Dependency:** Infura experienced Arbitrum outages during October 2024 AWS incidents, highlighting infrastructure centralization risks. Enterprise tier includes DIN failover, but lower tiers lack automatic redundancy.

**Technical Specifications:**

- **Rate Limits**: 500 credits/second (free) to 4,000 credits/second (Developer) to 40,000 credits/second (Team)
- **Geographic Distribution**: AWS-based global infrastructure
- **Node Software**: Maintained by ConsenSys, regular updates
- **Monitoring**: Basic dashboard included, advanced analytics on Enterprise tier

**Best For:** Applications prioritizing MetaMask compatibility and Ethereum ecosystem integration, teams building wallet interfaces or consumer-facing dApps where MetaMask's default RPC matters, organizations valuing ConsenSys backing and institutional credibility, and projects where DIN network participation provides desired redundancy through decentralization. **Not recommended** for applications requiring production-ready WebSocket (still in beta), teams needing native trace/debug implementation for minimum latency, or cost-sensitive high-volume applications where credit-based pricing becomes expensive at scale ($2,500-3,500/month for 100M requests vs $424-500 at transparent providers).

## Archive Node Access: The Critical Arbitrum Differentiator

While Arbitrum's blockchain protocol provides robust archive node functionality, **the infrastructure required to maintain archive access presents unique challenges** that only certain RPC providers have fully addressed. Understanding these technical realities and their pricing implications is essential for applications requiring historical data.

**The Archive Infrastructure Challenge:**

Arbitrum One has become what industry insiders describe as **"a very big archive chain"** for compelling technical reasons. Current storage requirements stand at **30 terabytes** for full Arbitrum One archive access, with growth of **2-3 terabytes monthly**—meaning storage requirements continue expanding at an accelerating rate as network activity increases. Arbitrum Nova requires an additional 4.3 TB with even faster growth (1.6-1.8 TB monthly).

This massive storage footprint exceeds most Layer 1 blockchains. For context, Bitcoin's complete blockchain is approximately 500 GB, while Ethereum requires roughly 1 TB for pruned nodes and 12-14 TB for full archive. Arbitrum's 30 TB archive requirement reflects its status as Ethereum's highest-activity Layer 2, processing **2.16 billion transactions** since launch with **3.4 million daily transactions** currently.

**Maintenance Burden:** The Arbitrum Foundation stopped updating public archive snapshots in May 2024 due to "accelerated database and state growth," forcing professional operators to create periodic backups themselves. This operational complexity, combined with 24/7 uptime requirements and regular software updates, makes archive infrastructure expensive and technically demanding.

**Why Archive Access Matters for Applications:**

Archive nodes store every state change from genesis, enabling critical use cases across the Arbitrum ecosystem:

**DeFi Analytics & Research:** Protocols like GMX ($780M TVL, $8M+ monthly fees), Camelot ($2.04B monthly volume), and Aave v3 ($1.1B+ TVL) require historical data for back-testing trading strategies, calculating time-weighted yields, analyzing liquidity migration patterns, and understanding protocol evolution. Without archive access, these analyses become impossible.

**Block Explorers:** Arbiscan and competing explorers need complete historical state data to answer queries like "What was this address's balance at block 12,345,678?" or "Show all historical interactions between these contracts." Standard pruned nodes cannot serve these queries—only archive nodes provide this capability.

**Compliance & Auditing:** With **2.16 billion+ transactions** processed since launch, regulatory compliance and forensic analysis demand full transaction history access. Law enforcement investigations, audit trail verification, and regulatory reporting all depend on complete historical data that only archive nodes provide.

**MEV & Trading Infrastructure:** Trading bots test strategies against historical data to validate profitability before deploying capital. MEV searchers analyze historical transaction patterns to identify opportunities. High-frequency trading systems require trace API access to understand execution paths and optimize strategies. None of these use cases work without comprehensive archive access.

**Developer Tools & Testing:** dApp developers building on Arbitrum require historical state queries for integration testing, debugging smart contracts that interact with established protocols, and analyzing past user interactions to improve UX. The Graph protocol and similar indexers depend on processing complete blockchain history to provide query services.

**Provider Archive Implementation Comparison:**

**Zero Archive Premium (Exceptional Value):**
- **Dwellir**: Dedicated archive endpoints, zero premium, includes trace/debug at 1:1 pricing

**Minimal Premium (Reasonable):**
- **Chainstack**: Full archive support from Growth tier ($49), 2x response units for archive queries
- **GetBlock**: 2x compute unit multiplier for archive requests (archive mode toggle in dashboard)

**Archive Access at Standard Pricing:**
- **Infura**: Currently same pricing for archive (though documentation notes this may change)

**Method-Based Multipliers (Expensive at Scale):**
- **QuickNode**: No archive premium, but 20x base multiplier + 2x-4x for trace/debug = 40x-80x effective cost
- **Alchemy**: No archive premium, but ❌ **NO trace API support for Arbitrum** (critical limitation)
- **Ankr**: No archive premium, but 200 credits per request = $20/million (high base cost)

**Trace and Debug API Availability:**

Not all archive implementations are equal. The presence or absence of trace and debug APIs fundamentally determines what historical analysis is possible:

**Full Trace & Debug Support:**
- **Dwellir**: Complete debug_* trace methods at 1:1 pricing
- **QuickNode**: Full trace API support (though expensive with 40x-80x multipliers)
- **Chainstack**: Complete trace/debug on archive nodes (Business tier+)
- **Ankr**: Trace and debug available on Premium tier

**Trace/Debug via Third-Party Routing:**
- **Infura**: Trace/debug routed through DIN partner network (not native infrastructure, adds latency)

**Limited or Missing Support:**
- **Alchemy**: ❌ **NO trace API for Arbitrum** (Ethereum mainnet only—dealbreaker for most archive use cases)
- **GetBlock**: Limited trace/debug on Shared Nodes; full support requires Dedicated Nodes (from $1,000/month)

**The Trace API Gap:** Alchemy's missing trace API support for Arbitrum deserves emphasis. While Alchemy provides trace functionality on Ethereum mainnet, this capability is explicitly unavailable for Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova. For applications requiring transaction tracing—block explorers, DeFi analytics, MEV research, compliance tools—this makes Alchemy unsuitable regardless of other strengths. Teams discovering this limitation after infrastructure selection face costly migrations.

## Complete Pricing Comparison: Real Costs Revealed

Understanding actual per-request costs is critical for accurate infrastructure budgeting. The table below reveals the true cost of RPC calls across providers by normalizing their various pricing models:

| **Provider** | **Plan** | **Monthly Cost** | **Price per Million Requests** | **Pricing Model** |
|-------------|---------|-----------------|-------------------------------|-------------------|
| **Dwellir** | Developer | $49 | **$1.96** | Requests (1:1) |
| **Dwellir** | Growth | $299 | **$1.99** | Requests (1:1) |
| **Dwellir** | Scale | $999 | **$2.00** | Requests (1:1) |
| **Chainstack** | Growth | $49 | **$2.45** | Requests (1:1) |
| **Chainstack** | Pro | $199 | **$2.49** | Requests (1:1) |
| **Chainstack** | Business | $349 | **$2.49** | Requests (1:1) |
| **Chainstack** | Enterprise | $990 | **$2.48** | Requests (1:1) |
| **GetBlock** | Advanced | $199 | **$9.05** | Compute Units (10:1) |
| **GetBlock** | Pro | $499 | **$8.32** | Compute Units (10:1) |
| **GetBlock** | Starter | $49 | **$9.80** | Compute Units (10:1) |
| **QuickNode** | Business | $999 | **$9.99** | Compute Units (20:1) |
| **QuickNode** | Scale | $499 | **$10.51** | Compute Units (20:1) |
| **QuickNode** | Accelerate | $249 | **$11.07** | Compute Units (20:1) |
| **Alchemy** | PAYG (High) | $2,000 | **$8.00** | Compute Units (20:1) |
| **Alchemy** | PAYG (Low) | $45 | **$11.70** | Compute Units (26:1) |
| **QuickNode** | Build | $49 | **$12.25** | Compute Units (20:1) |
| **Ankr** | PAYG | $50 | **$20.00** | Compute Units (200:1) |

## Choosing Your Arbitrum RPC Provider: Key Decision Factors

Selecting the optimal provider requires evaluating multiple dimensions beyond simple per-request costs, with particular attention to archive access requirements and trace API availability.

**Archive Access Requirements:** If your application needs historical data—DeFi analytics, block explorers, compliance tools, MEV research, or any analysis beyond current state—**archive access becomes non-negotiable**. Verify not just availability but actual costs:
- Providers with zero archive premium (Dwellir) offer exceptional value
- Providers with 2x multipliers (Chainstack, GetBlock) remain reasonable
- Providers with 40x-80x trace multipliers (QuickNode) become expensive for trace-heavy workloads
- Providers without trace API (Alchemy) cannot serve these use cases regardless of price

**Trace and Debug API Support:** Applications requiring transaction tracing or contract execution analysis—MEV bots, forensic tools, analytics platforms, block explorers—must verify comprehensive trace API support. **Alchemy's lack of trace API for Arbitrum** eliminates it from consideration for these use cases, while **QuickNode's 40x-80x multipliers** for trace operations significantly inflate costs compared to **Dwellir's 1:1 pricing** where trace calls cost the same as basic queries.

**Cost Forecasting Accuracy:** If your application's request volume will scale significantly—typical for DeFi protocols attracting TVL growth, analytics platforms expanding user bases, or trading infrastructure increasing strategy count—transparent 1:1 pricing from Dwellir and Chainstack dramatically simplifies financial planning versus compute unit systems. The difference between $2-5/million and $10-20/million becomes substantial: a 100 million request application costs $200-500/month versus $1,000-2,000/month—a $6,000-18,000 annual difference.

**Performance Requirements:** For latency-critical applications—high-frequency trading requiring sub-100ms responses, real-time DeFi interfaces where delayed data causes poor UX, or block explorers serving millions of queries—prioritize providers with robust global infrastructure and proven uptime. Both Dwellir and QuickNode operate enterprise-grade infrastructure with 99.99% SLAs, multi-region presence, and sophisticated load balancing. Verify geographic infrastructure proximity to user concentrations.

**Multi-Chain Strategy:** If building across multiple ecosystems—DeFi protocols operating on Arbitrum + Optimism + Base, analytics platforms tracking cross-chain liquidity, or trading infrastructure spanning diverse Layer 2s—providers like Dwellir (150+ chains), Ankr (80+ chains), or Chainstack (70+ chains) offer consolidated infrastructure. This reduces vendor complexity and simplifies operations versus managing chain-specific providers with varying interfaces, billing systems, and support models.

**Support Requirements:** Consider whether you need direct technical support from infrastructure experts who understand blockchain architecture (Dwellir's direct access model) versus comprehensive self-service documentation and tooling (QuickNode's platform approach). Early-stage teams often benefit from rapid access to knowledgeable support during critical debugging, while larger teams with internal expertise may prioritize sophisticated monitoring tools over support responsiveness.

**Infrastructure Philosophy:** Different providers take fundamentally different approaches to infrastructure:
- **Bare-metal self-hosted** (Dwellir): Maximum privacy, independence from cloud providers, dedicated hardware
- **Multi-cloud enterprise** (QuickNode, Chainstack): Geographic redundancy, automatic failover, enterprise SLAs
- **Decentralized** (Ankr): Philosophical alignment with Web3 values, resilience through distribution
- **Cloud-dependent** (Infura): Simplified operations but potential single-point-of-failure (October 2024 AWS outages affected Arbitrum)

Choose based on your organization's values, regulatory requirements (some industries prohibit public cloud), and risk tolerance for provider dependencies.

**Compute Unit Transparency:** When evaluating providers using compute unit pricing models, demand clear documentation of:
- Base multipliers per chain (Arbitrum uses 20x at QuickNode, 200 credits at Ankr)
- Method-specific multipliers (trace operations may be 2x-4x additional)
- Archive data multipliers (typically 0x-2x, but verify explicitly)
- Real-world cost examples for your specific request mix

Providers with published compute unit tables (Alchemy, GetBlock) enable accurate forecasting. Providers with opaque multiplier stacking (QuickNode's 20x × 2x × 4x for some operations) make cost prediction extremely difficult. **Transparent 1:1 providers (Dwellir, Chainstack) eliminate this complexity entirely.**

**Pricing Philosophy Alignment:** Determine whether your team prefers:
- **Complete transparency** with flat per-request pricing regardless of complexity (Dwellir, Chainstack)
- **Tooling ecosystem** with compute unit complexity accepted for comprehensive platform features (QuickNode)
- **Decentralized philosophy** with moderate pricing premium for distributed infrastructure (Ankr)
- **Developer-first platforms** with enhanced APIs justifying compute unit models (Alchemy—though unusable without trace API)

## Takeaways for Arbitrum Development Success

Arbitrum represents cutting-edge Ethereum scaling infrastructure designed for applications demanding high throughput and low transaction costs while maintaining Ethereum's security guarantees. However, realizing this potential requires partnering with RPC providers aligned with your application requirements, growth trajectory, and infrastructure philosophy—particularly around archive access.

Production applications must avoid public RPC endpoints, which impose severe rate limits and provide no reliability guarantees or SLA commitments. Invest in dedicated infrastructure matching your performance, budget, and support requirements—migration costs during growth exceed early infrastructure investment substantially. The $17.55 billion TVL on Arbitrum and 3.4 million daily transactions demonstrate that institutional capital and high-volume applications demand professional-grade infrastructure.

**Understand Real Costs Before Committing:** A provider advertising $0.10 per million compute units with 200-credit multipliers actually costs $20 per million real requests, while one charging $2.00 per million with 1:1 pricing delivers exactly what you expect. For high-volume applications processing 100 million monthly requests, this difference represents $1,600+ monthly variance—nearly $20,000 annually. **For trace-heavy workloads, compute unit multipliers of 40x-80x can create $18,000+ monthly cost differences** versus transparent pricing providers.

**Archive Access Determines Capabilities:** With Arbitrum requiring 30 TB for full archive access and growing 2-3 TB monthly, archive infrastructure is expensive—but essential for DeFi analytics, block explorers, compliance tools, MEV research, and most data-intensive applications. Providers offering **zero archive premium** (Dwellir, Chainstack, Infura currently) provide exceptional value, while those with **2x multipliers** (GetBlock) remain reasonable. However, **40x-80x trace multipliers** (QuickNode) or **missing trace APIs entirely** (Alchemy) can make providers unusable regardless of other strengths.

**Trace API Availability is Non-Negotiable:** For applications requiring transaction tracing—block explorers serving "show me all internal calls" queries, DeFi analytics calculating historical yields, MEV bots analyzing execution paths, or compliance tools providing audit trails—**trace API support is mandatory**. Alchemy's lack of trace API for Arbitrum eliminates it from consideration despite otherwise strong infrastructure. When evaluating providers, explicitly verify debug_* trace method support for comprehensive transaction analysis.

Test multiple providers during development using free tiers to identify optimal latency for your target markets and verify actual request patterns match cost estimates. Since Arbitrum adoption concentrates in DeFi protocols (global user bases), analytics platforms (compute-intensive queries), and trading infrastructure (latency-sensitive), verify performance characteristics match your specific use case rather than relying on generic benchmarks.

**For Most High-Performance Arbitrum Applications:** The combination of transparent pricing, comprehensive archive support, full trace/debug APIs at 1:1 cost, and proven enterprise-grade reliability makes **Dwellir** ($1.96-5.00/million with 1:1 pricing, 150+ networks, 99.99% SLA) an excellent choice for DeFi protocols, analytics platforms, institutional trading systems, and block explorer infrastructure. Teams requiring elastic scaling with transparent pricing should consider **Chainstack** ($2.45/million with instant archive deployment). Applications prioritizing comprehensive tooling ecosystems and willing to manage compute unit complexity should evaluate **QuickNode** despite higher costs for trace operations.

Alternative providers serve specific use cases based on their unique strengths. Evaluate your specific requirements—cost sensitivity, trace API usage intensity, multi-chain needs, tooling preferences, support models, and infrastructure philosophy—against each provider's differentiated capabilities.

The Arbitrum ecosystem continues rapid evolution with expanding DeFi TVL, growing institutional adoption, and increasing regulatory scrutiny demanding comprehensive data access. Choose providers demonstrating sustained commitment through active ecosystem participation, regular infrastructure updates, and deep understanding of Arbitrum's unique technical requirements—particularly around archive node complexity, dual-node synchronization, and trace API implementation. Your infrastructure partner should scale alongside your application's growth, maintaining performance and reliability as you move from thousands to millions of daily requests while preserving access to complete historical data.

By carefully evaluating requirements against these leading Arbitrum RPC providers—understanding real costs hidden behind compute unit multipliers, verifying comprehensive archive and trace API support, and assessing enterprise infrastructure capabilities—you establish the reliable, high-performance foundation necessary for building successful applications that leverage Arbitrum's revolutionary scaling capabilities and growing ecosystem.

## Get Started

### Ready to Build on Arbitrum?

Dwellir provides enterprise-grade Arbitrum infrastructure optimized for DeFi protocols, analytics platforms, and institutional trading applications:

- **1:1 Transparent Pricing**: No confusing compute units—$1.96-5.00 per million requests
- **Zero Archive Premium**: Historical data access costs same as current state queries
- **Full Trace & Debug APIs**: Complete debug_* trace method support at 1:1 pricing (no 40x-80x multipliers)
- **Enterprise-Grade Infrastructure**: 99.99% uptime SLA, global presence across four continents
- **Dedicated Archive Endpoints**: 30 TB+ complete Arbitrum history from genesis
- **Multi-Chain Coverage**: Seamlessly integrate 150+ blockchain networks
- **Expert Support**: Direct access to infrastructure specialists understanding Arbitrum architecture
- **Burst Protection**: 10x capacity headroom for handling traffic spikes and viral growth
- **Bare-Metal Infrastructure**: Privacy-focused deployment in self-hosted data centers

**Save $10,000-$45,000 annually** versus compute unit-based providers at 100M+ request scales.

**Contact**: [Get in touch](https://dwellir.com/contact)  
**Documentation**: [Dwellir Docs](https://dwellir.com/docs/arbitrum)  
**Access Arbitrum Network from Dwellir**: [Learn more](https://www.dwellir.com/networks/arbitrum)

### References

- [Arbitrum Documentation](https://docs.arbitrum.io/)
- [Arbitrum Archive Node Setup](https://docs.arbitrum.io/run-arbitrum-node/more-types/run-archive-node)
- [Arbiscan Block Explorer](https://arbiscan.io/)
- [L2BEAT Arbitrum Analytics](https://l2beat.com/scaling/projects/arbitrum)
- [Arbitrum Portal](https://portal.arbitrum.io/)
